Seems like a lot of impressive thinking in circles for no reason…. If something is theoretically possible….. but not really possible the “result”you find isn’t really… but maybe?! 🤯
@NewUser-e9v Apr 3, 2025
I don't think 37 was random 🤫
@mk1cortinatony395 Apr 3, 2025
Can anybody tell me as a layman what is/was the purpose of this ? Is it only me that thinks infinity is just that, we cant get to the end ever, not computers or humans
@jaarb7353 Apr 3, 2025
3:13 mistake. Starting at 16, all the square numbers seem to be shifted back by one, with 16's being skipped, except that also, on 16 is 269, when 17^2 is 289.
@dray7579 Apr 3, 2025
🤔😳😵💫🤯🤪
@paransolpark3928 Apr 3, 2025
Just noticed at 3:11 that the squares starting from 16 don't match.
@alexanderespinoza Apr 3, 2025
1:12 alwis
@vincentloh9709 Apr 3, 2025
I don't quite understand the justification for the Vitali set having undefined size. The reasoning claims that if the Vitali set has positive size, then merging it with itself an infinite number of times would result in a set of infinite size, which isn't possible because the size has to be between…
@OAN3476 Apr 3, 2025
I was gonna say 37 😮
@braindecay9477 Apr 3, 2025
27:50 yeah that happend to me too. It's way less cool than you'd expect before it actually happens 😬
Tbh, Southpark was correct. It's mainly just painful walking around like this, so I have to get a wheelbarrow
